Review Article

Precision Agriculture Science and Technology. 31 March 2025. 28-46
https://doi.org/10.22765/pastj.20250003

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  •   IoT and LoRaWAN applications in smart greenhouses

  •   LoRaWAN technology for smart greenhouse management

  •   Spatial environmental monitoring in smart greenhouses

  •   Environmental prediction models for smart greenhouses control

  •   Security and privacy considerations in IoT and LoRaWAN communication

  •   Challenges and future directions

  • Conclusions

Introduction

The rapid advancement of technology has significantly transformed agricultural practices, enabling a shift from traditional farming to precision agriculture. Smart agriculture leverages advanced sensors, automation, and data analytics to optimize resource utilization, improve crop yields, and enhance sustainability. Among the various applications of smart agriculture, greenhouse farming has gained prominence due to its ability to provide controlled environmental conditions for crops, ensuring year-round production and reduced dependency on climatic variations (Lee et al., 2023). However, effective greenhouse management requires continuous monitoring and control of critical environmental parameters such as temperature, humidity, light intensity, soil moisture, and CO2 levels (Bersani et al., 2022).

The integration of the Internet of Things (IoT) in precision agriculture has revolutionized data collection, analysis, and decision-making processes. IoT-based solutions facilitate real-time monitoring and automation, thereby reducing labor costs and improving overall efficiency (Ali et al., 2024). Wireless communication technologies play a crucial role in transmitting data from distributed sensor nodes to centralized systems, where advanced analytics can be performed. The selection of an appropriate wireless communication protocol is essential to ensure seamless connectivity, low power consumption, and long-range data transmission, particularly in large-scale greenhouse environments (Ahmed et al., 2024). Among these advancements, LoRaWAN has emerged as a promising spatial environmental monitoring and prediction solution in smart greenhouses (Sharma and Shivandu, 2024). LoRaWAN gateway technology facilitates real-time data collection and transmission over long distances while maintaining low power consumption, making it an ideal choice for remote and large-scale agricultural applications (Aldhaheri et al., 2024). In a smart greenhouse environment, LoRaWAN-based IoT networks enable the efficient transmission of environmental data such as temperature, humidity, light intensity, soil moisture, and carbon dioxide levels from distributed sensor nodes to a central gateway, which subsequently relays this information to a cloud-based server (Mowla et al., 2023). The collected data is then processed and visualized through an intuitive user interface, allowing real-time monitoring, spatial analysis, and predictive decision-making. Spatial monitoring of key environmental parameters provides growers with granular insights into microclimatic variations within different greenhouse zones, enabling targeted interventions that optimize growing conditions and enhance crop yield and quality (Hosny et al., 2024).

Temperature, humidity, light intensity, soil moisture, and carbon dioxide were among the most critical environmental factors influencing crop growth, transpiration, and disease control. Each crop exhibits specific temperature requirements throughout its growth stages; cool-season crops such as lettuce and spinach thrive at 15°C to 20°C, whereas warm-season crops like tomatoes and peppers prefer 25°C to 30°C (Singh 2018; Chaudhary et al., 2022). The humidity levels significantly impact plant physiology, with leafy greens thriving at 70% to 80% humidity, while fruit crops perform best at 60% to 70% humidity to minimize fungal risks (Ferrante and Mariani, 2018). To address challenges in environmental sensing within greenhouses, researchers have increasingly explored the integration of IoT with long-range communication technologies such as LoRaWAN. This combination enables real-time, scalable monitoring solutions that enhance precision agriculture practices in smart greenhouse environments (Shamshiri et al., 2021). The physical performance of LoRaWAN technology ensures stable communication and network reliability, which is essential for large-scale environmental monitoring in greenhouses. The study showed that LoRaWAN networks maintain an SNR (Signal-to-Noise Ratio) above 11.875 dB within a range of 50 to 100 meters, ensuring robust connectivity and minimal data loss (Kufakunesu et al., 2024). The distance extends beyond 500 meters, the SNR declines below 4.3 dB, resulting in connectivity issues, increased error rates, and reduced system reliability (Ketshabetswe et al., 2019). To mitigate these limitations, strategic solutions such as optimized antenna placement, signal repeaters, and adaptive network configurations must be implemented to sustain uninterrupted data transmission and ensure the reliability of predictive greenhouse monitoring systems.

The adoption of LoRaWAN-enabled IoT systems in smart agriculture has demonstrated significant advantages, including long-range communication, low power consumption, cost-effectiveness, and scalability. Research has proven the effectiveness of LoRaWAN in applications such as remote soil moisture monitoring, automated irrigation control, and livestock tracking, making it a versatile solution for various smart farming operations (Alumfareh et al., 2024). Looking ahead, future advancements in machine learning, advanced analytics, and automation are expected to further enhance predictive capabilities, enabling real-time decision-making and adaptive environmental management (Sun and Scanlon, 2019). As global food security challenges continue to grow, integrating LoRaWAN technology with AI-driven predictive modeling and automation will play a pivotal role in ensuring sustainable agricultural practices, optimized resource utilization, and climate-resilient farming systems (Shahab et al., 2024).

Despite the growing adoption of LoRaWAN-enabled IoT solutions in smart agriculture, challenges such as data reliability, network scalability, interoperability, and energy efficiency remain key concerns. While various studies have explored LoRaWAN applications in precision farming, a focused review of its role in monitoring and predicting spatial environmental parameters in smart greenhouses is lacking. Given the increasing demand for automation and data-driven decision-making in controlled agricultural environments, there is a critical need to synthesize existing research, identify current limitations, and highlight future directions. This review aims to bridge this gap by providing a comprehensive analysis of IoT-enabled LoRaWAN gateway deployment in smart greenhouses. The objective of this review was to explore the deployment of IoT-enabled LoRaWAN gateways for monitoring and predicting spatial environmental parameters in smart greenhouses. It provides a comprehensive analysis of the architecture, communication protocols, sensor integration, and data processing methodologies employed in these systems.

IoT and LoRaWAN applications in smart greenhouses

Smart agriculture is revolutionizing traditional farming methods by integrating advanced technologies such as the IoT and LoRaWAN. These technologies facilitate precision farming, enabling real-time data collection, analysis, and automation. Among the most transformative applications of IoT and LoRaWAN is their role in smart greenhouses, where they enhance crop growth, optimize resource usage, and improve overall productivity (Mowla et al., 2023; Kim et al., 2023). Smart greenhouse uses IoT and LoRaWAN technologies to efficiently and cheaply monitor spatial environmental parameters at scale, energy. IoT sensor networks enable precision and climate-adaptive farming by collecting real environmental data (Selvam, 2023). LoRaWAN sensor nodes typically consume 7.66 µA up 34mA in sleep mode, depending on the device and configuration, and are priced below $10 per unit, making them highly suitable for long-term, low-maintenance deployment in greenhouse environments where energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness are critical (López-Ortiz et al., 2020) Recent studies suggest that LoRaWAN-enabled smart agriculture systems outperform conventional monitoring methods. The packet delivery rate at 700 meters was 40.9%, this performance significantly surpassed that of conventional Wi-Fi systems operating under the same greenhouse interference conditions. These findings underscore LoRaWAN superior robustness and suitability for long-range, low-power communication in complex greenhouse environments (Singh et al., 2020).

Alongside environmental monitoring, IoT-LoRaWAN infrastructures enhanced by predictive analytics and AI have significantly advanced decision-making in agriculture. Kontogiannis et al. (2024) developed a deep learning-based LoRaWAN system to predict vineyard diseases and detect early fungal infections, achieving an accuracy of above 90% for relative humidity and temperature between 12°C and 26°C. The model achieved high accuracy due to the stable microclimate of the greenhouse, LoRaWAN significantly contributed by enabling continuous, real-time data transmission. This connectivity is vital for supporting predictive analytics and responsive control systems in smart greenhouse applications (Valente et al., 2023). Recent advances in edge computing and federated learning have improved the real-time processing capabilities of LoRaWAN-enabled agricultural systems, reducing reliance on cloud infrastructure and enhancing data security (Ray and Skala, 2022). Recent studies have introduced LoRaWAN-specific enhancements such as the use of directional antennas, Adaptive Data Rate (ADR) optimization, and elevated gateway placement, which collectively reduced packet loss by up to 35% in greenhouses affected by structural interference. These modifications improve communication reliability in complex indoor agricultural settings (Frausto-Vicencio et al., 2021). Fig. 1 shows an IoT and LoRaWAN-based smart farm monitoring greenhouse system. The system automates environmental monitoring with a microprocessor, power supply, sensors, and actuators.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kspa/2025-007-01/N0570070103/images/kspa_2025_071_028_F1.jpg
Fig. 1.

An IoT and LoRaWAN-based smart greenhouse monitoring and control system.

LoRaWAN technology for smart greenhouse management

LoRaWAN technology in a smart greenhouse enables efficient, long-range, low-power communication between several sensor nodes and a cloud-based monitoring system. The ability to preserve signal integrity over extended distances with minimum power and data loss makes it an ideal solution for large-scale environmental monitoring and predictive analytics in controlled agricultural environments (Aldhaheri et al., 2024). The implementation of Adaptive Data Rate (ADR) and error-checking protocols ensures the LoRaWAN gateways can reliably transmit data over 15 kilometers with a packet loss rate of less than 0.1% in rural and semi-urban applications (Kufakunesu et al., 2020; Tamang et al., 2022). The integration of Ethernet and cellular connectivity boosts network uptime to 99.9%, making greenhouse environmental monitoring systems more reliable (Bolla et al., 2011). The architecture of the LoRaWAN gateway facilitates seamless interaction between sensor nodes and centralized data management platforms by employing Chirp Spread Spectrum (CSS) modulation within sub-GHz ISM bands. LoRaWAN ensures high inference immunity and energy-efficient transmission, making it well-suited for greenhouse applications.

ADR algorithms modify transmission parameters based on environmental and network conditions to enhance network performance (Abdallah et al., 2024). The large-scale agricultural installations, ADR-based optimization reduced packet loss by 28% and increased network performance by 35% (Gkotsiopoulos et al., 2021). Fig. 2 illustrates the comparison of LoRaWAN communication classes for Class A, which is ideal for low-power battery-operated sensors with high latency and limited downlink availability. Class C offers real-time control with frequent downlink access but consumes the most power, while Class B provides a balanced trade-off between power consumption and responsiveness (Cheong et al., 2017).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kspa/2025-007-01/N0570070103/images/kspa_2025_071_028_F2.jpg
Fig. 2.

Comparison of LoRaWAN communication classes for IoT-based smart greenhouse monitoring.

The physical procedure sub-layer of the LoRaWAN gateway operates through a Finite State Machine (FSM) model, ensuring efficient channel access, message scheduling, and error management. The structured approach reduces packet collisions and enhances throughput, especially in crowded sensor setups where gateway congestion could be an issue (Park and Kim, 2021). Field tests have shown that FSM-based scheduling enhances channel efficiency by 22% and decreases retransmission rates by 19% compared to conventional time-division methods (Sachtleben and Peleska, 2022). Just-In-Time (JIT) scheduling for enhanced packet forwarding efficiency, a dual buffer-queue system, utilizing JIT scheduling principles, is implemented to enhance packet forwarding efficiency. The experimental findings indicate that JIT scheduling effectively minimizes thread blocking and decreases packet latency by as much as 30%, facilitating uninterrupted data transmission, especially in Class C device operations that necessitate continuous downlink communication (Wang and Fan, 2020). Long-term evaluation demonstrates an 18% reduction in packet queuing delays, thereby greatly improving the reliability of real-time data in environmental monitoring applications (Lazarescu, 2013). Table 1 shows the impact of JIT scheduling on network performance in greenhouse monitoring applications.

Table 1.

JIT scheduling impact on network performance in greenhouse monitoring applications.

Performance metric JIT scheduling impact Formula Application scenario Reference
Channel efficiency (CE) Enhance channel efficiency CE=SuccessfultransmissionsTotaltransmissions×100% Greenhouse sensor congestion management Săcăleanu et al. (2024)
Retransmission rate (RR) Decreases retransmission rate RR=RetransmissionsTotaltransmissions×100% Mitigating message collisions in high-density networks Larsson et al. (2016)
Packet latency (PL) reduction Reduces packet latency PL=Tb-Ta
Tb= Packet latency before JIT scheduling, and Ta= Packet latency after JIT scheduling
Optimizing downlink communications for Class C devices Flach et al. (2013)
Packet queuing delay (QD) reduction Reduces queuing delays   Tqb = Queue delay before JIT scheduling,
Tqa = Queue delay after JIT scheduling
Long-term performance enhancement Xue et al. (2024)
Reliability (R) improvement in real-time data Improves real-time data reliability RR=ValiddatapacketsTotaldatapackets×100% Reliable environmental monitoring data transmission Liu et al. (2019)

LoRaWAN end-node communication achieves an optimal balance between transmission range and energy efficiency. Field studies indicate that battery-operated end nodes can function for over 10 years, benefiting from ADR optimization and low-power listening modes (Mehic et al., 2022). Class A devices further enhance climate control actuation by automatically adjusting greenhouse conditions in response to environmental fluctuations. LoRaWAN-based climate monitoring systems have been shown to improve crop yields by up to 20%, attributed to precise microclimate management (Et-taibi et al., 2024). Security and data integrity in LoRaWAN networks LoRaWAN operates through three distinct communication classes (A, B, and C), each designed to optimize energy consumption, communication delay, and data security. Fig. 3 shows LoRaWAN security architecture for end-node communication. Secure wireless transmission is achieved through AES-128 encryption, ensuring data integrity and protection against unauthorized access (Thaenkaew et al., 2023).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kspa/2025-007-01/N0570070103/images/kspa_2025_071_028_F3.jpg
Fig. 3.

LoRaWAN security architecture for end-node communication.

Smart greenhouse control and environmental monitoring using IoT technology for optimal crop productivity, plant health, and disease prevention, it is essential to maintain the greenhouse temperature and humidity at ideal levels. Environmental parameters such as temperature, humidity, CO₂ concentration, and soil moisture must be continuously monitored to prevent yield losses due to insect infestations, mildew infections, and unfavorable growing conditions (Ali et al., 2024). IoT-enabled sensor networks provide real-time environmental data, empowering growers to make informed decisions regarding greenhouse climate control. Energy efficiency for smart greenhouse automation systems leveraging LoRaWAN for ventilation and heating optimization can achieve energy savings of up to 26% (Rayhana et al., 2020). Enhancing water use efficiency through automated irrigation technologies integrated with LoRaWAN-enabled IoT systems has proven effective in optimizing irrigation scheduling and reducing water waste (Glória et al., 2020) and disease prevention such as machine learning-based predictive analytics can detect early-stage fungal infections with 87% accuracy, mitigating crop loss risks (Zhao et al., 2024). LoRaWAN connectivity enables continuous environmental monitoring, ensuring real-time modifications to climate control settings that enhance crop growth, reduce resource waste, and improve overall agricultural efficiency compared to conventional manual monitoring techniques (Ahmed et al., 2024). A typical LoRaWAN-based deployment in greenhouses involves placing sensor nodes at both canopy and root zones, spaced approximately 10–20 meters apart to ensure optimal coverage. Gateways are commonly installed at heights of 2.5 meters or more to maintain line-of-sight and reduce interference from metallic greenhouse structures (Singh et al., 2020). Future advancements in AI-driven analytics, blockchain-based data security, and integrated automation will further enhance LoRaWAN’s role in predictive greenhouse management, fostering sustainable smart farming practices and improving food security worldwide (Lim et al., 2023). Fig. 4 represents an IoT-based smart agriculture monitoring system, structured into four layers: perception layer, network layer, middleware layer, and application layer. Each layer plays a distinct role in data acquisition, transmission, processing, and visualization.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kspa/2025-007-01/N0570070103/images/kspa_2025_071_028_F4.jpg
Fig. 4.

IoT-based spatial monitoring and environment prediction system for smart greenhouses.

Spatial environmental monitoring in smart greenhouses

Spatial variability refers to the differences in environmental and soil conditions that occur naturally or due to external influences in a greenhouse (Iqbal et al., 2023). Uneven light distribution, temperature fluctuations, soil nutrient imbalances, and inconsistent humidity levels can negatively impact plant growth, leading to suboptimal yields and quality variations (Iqbal et al., 2023; Reza et al., 2023). Addressing these disparities is crucial for maintaining uniform growth conditions, ensuring that each plant receives the optimal resources required for its development. Spatial environmental monitoring in smart greenhouses collects and analyzes data like temperature, humidity, CO₂ concentrations, light intensity, and soil moisture sensors across many locations (Ahmed et al., 2019). Spatial monitoring utilizes dispersed sensor networks to collect real-time environmental variability data, enabling adaptive management of plant growth, resource usage, and production, unlike single-point greenhouse monitoring methods (Bersani et al., 2022). In greenhouse environments, variations in temperature and humidity often caused by inconsistent airflow, structural shading, or equipment heat can influence transpiration, photosynthesis, and nutrient uptake, thereby complicating precise climate control (Costantino et al., 2021). Temperature variations over 2°C among greenhouse zones can diminish crop uniformity by 12% (Ahmed et al., 2019). Localized CO₂ variations might lower carbon absorption rates, lowering yield potential (Parry et al., 2011). Recent Studies show that producers need real-time geographical monitoring for temperature adjustment to manage climatic variations proactively (Parra-López et al., 2024). Site-specific temperature management increased greenhouse crop output by 18% and reduced energy usage by 25%, regardless of spatial environmental monitoring (Nadal et al., 2017). Resource loss has increased by 30% due to regional water and nutrient application unpredictability (Mueller et al., 2012). Despite these obstacles, spatial environmental monitoring has several benefits. Precision agriculture greenhouse operations can benefit from data-driven, site-specific treatments (Getahun et al., 2024). Climate modeling suggests that automated control systems for spatial environmental monitoring reduce plant stress and increase production (Manfreda et al., 2018). Precision irrigation and fertilization using spatial data analysis have reduced water and fertilizer use by 35% while preserving crop quality (Ahmed et al., 2023). Automation reduces plant stress and boosts output (Chauhdary et al., 2024). Precision irrigation and fertilization using spatial data analysis can save 35% while preserving production quality (Lu et al., 2022). Table 2 illustrates the comprehensive summary of sensor types, measurement ranges, accuracy levels, and spatial monitoring applications for environmental parameter assessment.

Table 2.

Environmental sensors for spatial monitoring in smart greenhouse.

Type Name Range Accuracy Application References
Temperature sensors Thermocouple sensor -200°C to 1300°C ±0.5°C to ±2.0°C Spatial temperature distribution Zhao et al. (2021)
RTD sensor -200°C to 850°C ±0.1°C to ±0.5°C Precise localized temperature data Ruan et al. (2023)
Thermistor sensor -50°C to 150°C ±0.2°C to ±1.0°C Fine-scale monitoring Navarro-Serrano et al. (2019)
Silicon sensor -55°C to 150°C ±0.5°C Temperature mapping Sadiqbatcha et al. (2022)
Humidity sensors Capacitive sensor 0% to 100% RH ±2% to ±5% RH Wide-area assessment Renzone et al. (2022)
Resistive sensor 10% to 95% RH ±3% to ±7% RH Localized humidity variations Ismail et al. (2016)
Thermal sensor 0% to 100% RH ±2% to ±5% RH Spatial distribution of humidity Kowli et al. (2023)
CO2 sensors Optical-based sensor 0 to 5000 ppm ±50 ppm or ±3% CO₂ concentration mapping Buckley et al. (2020)
Electrochemical sensor 0 to 10000 ppm ±50–100 ppm Spot measurements in the greenhouse Bassous et al. (2024)
Metal oxide-based sensor 400 to 5000 ppm ±100–200 ppm General air quality monitoring Zhang et al. (2022)
Light sensors Photo active radiation sensor 400 to 700 nm ±5% to ±10% Light intensity variation mapping Zeng et al. (2019)
Photo diode sensor 320 to 1100 nm ±2% to ±5% Point-based light level detection Honkavaara et al. (2016)
Photo transistor sensor 400 to 700 nm ±5% to ±10% Small-scale light monitoring Tang et al. (2024)
Pyranometer sensor 300 to 2800 nm ±3% to ±5% Greenhouse-wide light distribution da Rocha et al. (2021)
Light-dependent resistor sensor 400 to 700 nm ±10% Simple brightness level mapping Al-Haija and Samad (2020)
Soil moisture sensors Tensiometer sensor 0 to -100 kPa ±1% to ±5% Point-based soil moisture levels Bierer and Tang (2024)
Granular matrix sensor (GMS) 0 to -200 kPa ±2% to ±5% Distributed soil moisture tracking Gorthi et al. (2020)
TDR sensor 0% to 100% VWC ±1% to ±3% High-resolution soil mapping Bicamumakuba et al. (2024)
Capacitive sensor 5% to 50% VWC ±3% to ±7% Large-scale soil moisture assessment Adla et al. (2020)

Environmental monitoring serves as a smart greenhouse with IoT-enabled real-time data collecting, analysis, and control. To monitor local greenhouse conditions, IoT sensor networks use ecological sensors like temperature, humidity, CO₂, light intensity, and soil moisture sensors (Hosny et al., 2024). The claim was that by 20–30% suitable sensor placement including height and inter-sensor spacing improves data dependability and predictive modelingfor or real-time environmental data collecting. LoRaWAN facilitates continuous, long-range data acquisition, which is fundamental for training and operating AI-based predictive models in greenhouse environments. Recent studies have demonstrated that LoRa-integrated deep learning systems can achieve over 94% accuracy in forecasting microclimatic conditions and plant diseases, underscoring the synergy between reliable data transmission and advanced analytics (Ihoume et al., 2023). Fig. 5 displays the LoRaWAN mesh network topology (Cotrim and Kleinschmidt, 2020). Smart greenhouse sensor networks would benefit from LoRaWAN low-power, long-range wireless communication, which uses 50% less power than Wi-Fi and Zigbee (Arshad et al., 2022). LoRaWAN-based monitoring systems effectively transmit data. Conventional wireless methods exhibited 40% poorer network stability and data accuracy than LoRaWAN-enabled greenhouses (Citoni, 2022). Edge computing improves system responsiveness by lowering cloud dependency and latency, therefore lessening their influence. While keeping extremely accurate greenhouse environmental parameter prediction compared to cloud-based processing, edge computing reduces data transmission costs (Hamdan et al., 2020). Blockchain-based data security guards greenhouse monitoring data from cyberattacks and illegal access evaluated LoRaWAN and 5G hybrid communication systems for data transmission efficiency enhanced sensor calibration and produced machine-learning-driven anomaly detection methods (Garcia and Patel, 2017).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kspa/2025-007-01/N0570070103/images/kspa_2025_071_028_F5.jpg
Fig. 5.

LoRaWAN mesh network topology for real-time environmental data collection.

Environmental prediction models for smart greenhouses control

Environmental prediction models for smart greenhouses control are essential for enhancing climate regulation, energy efficiency, and plant growth management. These models are categorized into two primary types: those based on energy and mass equations, and those based on inputs, outputs, and optimization methods (Chen et al., 2022). Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have led smart greenhouses to increasingly depend on AI-driven environmental prediction models to improve precision agriculture (Hoseinzadeh and Garcia, 2024). Microclimate prediction models employ machine learning algorithms, such as regression analysis, artificial neural networks, and time-series forecasting, to anticipate variations in environmental concentration (Han et al., 2024). The forecasts provide immediate environmental modifications, enhancing cultivation conditions while reducing resource utilization. The illustrated formula 1 and 2 shows the energy balance equation for greenhouse temperature prediction and AI-based disease prediction using logistic regression for the environmental prediction models for smart greenhouses control (Lee et al., 2024).

(1)
CpmdTdt=Qin -Qout +Qgen 
(2)
Py=1x=11+eω1x1+ω2x2++ωnxn+b

Where, Cp represents the specific heat capacity of air, m is the mass of air inside the greenhouse, dT/dt is the rate of temperature change, Qin is the incoming heat energy from solar radiation and artificial heating, Qout is the outgoing heat loss due to ventilation, conduction, and radiation and Qgen in the internally generated heat from plant respiration and heating systems while P(y=1/x) is the probability of disease occurrence, ωi is the model weights and bi s the bias term.

Recent studies have shown that integrating data-driven decision support systems (DSS) into smart greenhouse control frameworks enhances climate management strategies, reducing energy consumption by up to 25% (Ukoba et al., 2024). Fig. 6 illustrates microclimate prediction, energy optimization, and plant growth management using computational models. The models are classified into energy/mass equation-based models and data-driven AI/optimization models for analysis to enhance smart greenhouse control.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kspa/2025-007-01/N0570070103/images/kspa_2025_071_028_F6.jpg
Fig. 6.

The environmental prediction model framework for smart greenhouses.

Energy optimization models improve efficiency with AI-based methods including genetic algorithms, PSO, and fuzzy modeling. Research shows that AI-driven temperature control systems increase crop uniformity and output by 18% while reducing energy use (Habeeb et al., 2023). The AI-enhanced irrigation and fertilization models reduced water and fertilizer utilization by 35% without affecting crop quality and monitoring plant health and identifying risks, plant growth, and issue detection models use AI-driven disease prediction and optimization (Wei et al., 2024). A logistic regression model can be used for AI-based disease detection: where are environmental and physiological variables, model weights, bias term, and sigmoid activation function. AI-based disease detection systems can detect early-stage fungal infections with 87% accuracy, reducing crop losses (Fatima, 2025). Predictive AI-based environmental regulation boosts crop output by 20%, demonstrating AI importance in sustainable greenhouse management (Kale, 2024). The models show that artificial neural networks, genetic algorithms, fuzzy modeling, and time-series forecasting are increasingly used to optimize greenhouse conditions. Future research should improve real-time processing using edge computing and integrate blockchain technology for safe data management to make AI-powered greenhouse management resilient and efficient.

Security and privacy considerations in IoT and LoRaWAN communication

Effective communication in smart greenhouses utilizing LoRaWAN technology requires a focus on security and privacy, given the sensitivity of environmental data and the potential security threats to agricultural IoT networks (Garcia and Patel, 2017). Key management issues, device authentication, and repeat assaults all depend on improved security mechanisms. You et al. (2018) pointed out that LoRaWAN networks were vulnerable to unwanted access due to static session keys, emphasizing the need for dynamic authentication and key rotations. The controlled penetration test of a smart agricultural LoRaWAN system revealed that ABP devices exhibited a higher vulnerability to packet injection attacks compared to Over-The-Air-Activation (OTAA) devices. The use of blockchain-based authentication decreases illegal access attempts from 14 per hour to just two when paired with ECC-based encryption, thereby enhancing network resilience (Kuntke et al., 2022).

Packet transmission frequency and network traffic analysis allow attackers to determine geographical patterns and activity levels, compromising privacy. In a large-scale privacy investigation of LoRaWAN installations in smart agricultural systems. Asteriou et al. (2024) discovered that nodes broadcasting at fixed intervals without adaptive scheduling were more vulnerable to pattern recognition attacks. Field testing reveals that improved LoRaWAN protocol with pseudonymized device addresses reduces packet correlation by 40%. Privacy-preserving federated learning models reduce data transport issues, while dynamic key management frameworks and AI prevent intrusion. Future advancements in blockchain-based security, AI-driven threat detection, post-quantum cryptography, and zero-trust architecture will further strengthen IoT and LoRaWAN networks against evolving cyber threats. As precision agriculture increasingly relies on IoT, prioritizing security and privacy measures will be crucial to ensuring reliable and resilient smart greenhouse operations.

Challenges and future directions

Despite the significant advancements in IoT-enabled LoRaWAN gateways for smart greenhouse monitoring, several challenges remain that must be addressed to maximize their efficiency, scalability, and reliability. As the number of sensor nodes increases, LoRaWAN networks face congestion, packet collisions, and reduced data transmission efficiency. Interoperability between different IoT platforms, sensor types, and communication protocols remains a key challenge, requiring standardized frameworks and seamless integration strategies. Although LoRaWAN offers long-range communication, its data transmission is susceptible to packet loss, signal attenuation, and interference, particularly in dense sensor environments. Just-In-Time (JIT) scheduling and Adaptive Data Rate (ADR) mechanisms need further optimization to reduce latency and improve real-time decision-making.

Many greenhouse sensors and gateways rely on battery power, requiring energy-efficient designs for prolonged operation. While LoRaWAN enables low-power communication, optimizing duty cycles and integrating renewable energy sources (e.g., solar energy) is crucial for sustainable deployment. LoRaWAN's security framework employs AES-128 encryption for secure end-to-end communication, but vulnerabilities still exist, such as unauthorized access, jamming attacks, and data spoofing. Blockchain-based security solutions and advanced encryption techniques can further enhance data integrity and privacy. Greenhouses experience fluctuating environmental conditions, including temperature extremes, humidity variations, and electromagnetic interference. Ensuring the robustness of LoRaWAN-enabled IoT hardware and maintaining stable network performance under diverse climatic conditions is a challenge that requires further research.

AI-powered predictive models can enhance the accuracy of spatial environmental monitoring, enabling automated decision-making for climate control and irrigation management. Future studies should focus on real-time AI processing through edge computing to reduce cloud dependency and improve response times. Combining LoRaWAN with other wireless communication technologies such as 5G, LPWAN, and satellite communication can provide more reliable, scalable, and high-speed data transmission for large-scale smart greenhouse applications. Edge computing reduces latency and enhances system responsiveness by processing environmental data locally before transmitting it to the cloud. Future research should explore efficient edge-computing architectures and their integration with LoRaWAN for smart greenhouse monitoring.

To improve energy sustainability, smart greenhouses should integrate renewable energy sources such as solar panels and energy-harvesting techniques to power IoT sensor nodes and gateways efficiently. Implementing blockchain technology can enhance data security, provide transparent record-keeping, and protect against cyber threats in LoRaWAN-enabled greenhouse monitoring systems. Future studies should examine the feasibility of blockchain-based smart contracts for automated greenhouse management. Enhancing the accuracy and reliability of environmental monitoring requires multi-sensor fusion techniques that combine data from different types of sensors. Machine learning algorithms can be used to calibrate sensors dynamically and improve data consistency.

By addressing these challenges and exploring future research directions, LoRaWAN-enabled IoT solutions can revolutionize smart greenhouse management, improving sustainability, efficiency, and food security.

Conclusions

The integration of IoT-enabled LoRaWAN gateways in smart greenhouses has revolutionized spatial environmental monitoring, enabling real-time data collection, predictive analytics, and automated climate control. This review has highlighted the key advantages of LoRaWAN technology, including its long-range communication capabilities, low power consumption, and cost-effectiveness for large-scale greenhouse applications. LoRaWAN networks facilitate the seamless transmission of crucial environmental parameters such as temperature, humidity, soil moisture, CO₂ concentration, and light intensity, providing growers with actionable insights to optimize crop yield and resource utilization. The deployment of machine learning models further enhances predictive decision-making, enabling proactive interventions to maintain optimal growing conditions.

However, challenges such as network scalability, data reliability, security vulnerabilities, and energy management must be addressed to maximize the effectiveness of LoRaWAN-based monitoring systems. Future advancements in AI-driven analytics, edge computing, blockchain security, and hybrid communication networks will play a crucial role in overcoming these limitations and enhancing the robustness of smart greenhouse technologies.

As global food security challenges intensify, the continued development of IoT-based smart farming solutions will be essential for sustainable agriculture. By integrating LoRaWAN with AI, automation, and secure data management systems, greenhouse operations can achieve higher efficiency, reduce environmental impact, and improve crop quality. Ongoing research and innovation in this field will ensure that smart greenhouses remain at the forefront of precision agriculture, contributing to a more resilient and productive agricultural ecosystem.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (IPET) through Smart Farm Multi-Ministry Package Innovation Technology Development Project, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (Project No. RS-2024-00399854), Republic of Korea.

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare there is no conflict of interest.

References

1

Abdallah, B., Khriji, S., Chéour, R., Lahoud, C., Moessner, K., Kanoun, O. 2024. Improving the reliability of long-range communication against interference for non-line-of-sight conditions in industrial Internet of Things applications. Applied Sciences 14(2): 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14020868

10.3390/app14020868
2

Adla, S., Rai, N.K., Karumanchi, S.H., Tripathi, S., Disse, M., Pande, S. 2020. Laboratory calibration and performance evaluation of low-cost capacitive and very low-cost resistive soil moisture sensors. Sensors 20(2): 20020363. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20020363

10.3390/s2002036331936425PMC7014303
3

Ahmed, H.A., Tong, Y.X., Yang, Q.C., Al-Faraj, A.A., Abdel-Ghany, A.M. 2019. Spatial distribution of air temperature and relative humidity in the greenhouse as affected by external shading in arid climates. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 18(12): 2869-2882. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62598-0

10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62598-0
4

Ahmed, S., Reza, M.N., Samsuzzaman, Karim, M.R., Jin, H., Kim, H., Chung, S.O. 2024. Vegetation effects on LoRa-based wireless sensor communication for remote monitoring of automatic orchard irrigation status. IoT 6(1): 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/iot6010002

10.3390/iot6010002
5

Ahmed, Z., Gui, D., Murtaza, G., Yunfei, L., Ali, S. 2023. An overview of smart irrigation management for improving water productivity under climate change in drylands. Agronomy 13(8): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13082113

10.3390/agronomy13082113
6

Al-Haija, Q.A., Samad, M.D. 2020. Efficient LuxMeter design using TM4C123 microcontroller with motion detection application. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS 2020). pp. 331-336. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICS49469.2020.239523

10.1109/ICICS49469.2020.239523
7

Aldhaheri, L., Alshehhi, N., Manzil, I.I.J., Khalil, R.A., Javaid, S., Saeed, N., Alouini, M.S. 2024. LoRa communication for agriculture 4.0: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 12(2): 1380-1407. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2024.3486369

10.1109/JIOT.2024.3486369
8

Ali, M., Gunawan, A.A.N., Prasetya, D.A., Ibrahim, M.Z.B., Diyasa, I.G.S.M. 2024. Impact of smart greenhouse using IoT for enhanced quality of plant growth. International Journal of Robotics and Control Systems 4(3): 1473-1489. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijrcs.v4i3.1277

10.31763/ijrcs.v4i3.1277
9

Alumfareh, M.F., Humayun, M., Ahmad, Z., Khan, A. 2024. An intelligent LoRaWAN-based IoT device for monitoring and control solutions in smart farming through anomaly detection integrated with unsupervised machine learning. IEEE Access 12: 119072- 119086. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3450587

10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3450587
10

Arshad, J., Aziz, M., Al-Huqail, A.A., Zaman, M.H.U., Husnain, M., Rehman, A.U., Shafiq, M. 2022. Implementation of a LoRaWAN-based smart agriculture decision support system for optimum crop yield. Sustainability 14(2): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020827

10.3390/su14020827
11

Asteriou, V, Kantelis K, Beletsioti GA, Valkanis A, Nicopolitidis P, Papadimitriou G. 2024. Adaptive Spatial Scheduling for Event Traffic in LoRaWAN Networks. Sensors 24(7): 2222. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24072222

10.3390/s2407222238610433PMC11014082
12

Bassous. N.J., Rodriguez, A.C., Leal, C.I.L., Jung, H.Y., Lee, C.K., Joo, S., Kim, S., Yun, C., Hahm, M.G., Ahn, M., Kim, S., Oh, Y.S., Shin, S.R. 2024. Significance of various sensing mechanisms for detecting local and atmospheric greenhouse gases: A review. Advanced Sensor Research 3(2): 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsr.202470007

10.1002/adsr.202470007
13

Bersani, C., Ruggiero, C., Sacile, R., Soussi, A., Zero, E. 2022. Internet of Things approaches for monitoring and control of smart greenhouses in Industry 4.0. Energies 15(10):3834. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103834

10.3390/en15103834
14

Bicamumakuba, E., Habineza, E., Lee, K., Chung, S. 2024. Sensor technologies for remote monitoring of automated orchard irrigation: A review. Precision Agriculture Science and Technology 6(2): 81-95.

15

Bierer, A.M., Tang, L. 2024. Drought responses in three apple cultivars using an autonomous sensor-based irrigation system. HortScience 59(4): 431-441. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI17520-23

10.21273/HORTSCI17520-23
16

Bolla, R., Bruschi, R., Davoli, F., Cucchietti, F. 2011. Energy efficiency in the future Internet: A survey of existing approaches and trends in energy-aware fixed network infrastructures. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 13(2): 223-244. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2011.071410.00073

10.1109/SURV.2011.071410.00073
17

Buckley, D.J., Black, N.C.G., Castanon, E.G., Melios, C., Hardman, M., Kazakova, O. 2020. Frontiers of graphene and 2D material-based gas sensors for environmental monitoring. 2D Materials 7(3): 032002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ab7bc5

10.1088/2053-1583/ab7bc5
18

Chaudhary, S., Devi, P., HanumanthaRao, B., Jha, U.C., Sharma, K.D., Prasad, P.V.V., Kumar, S., Siddique, K.H.M., Nayyar, H. 2022. Physiological and molecular approaches for developing thermotolerance in vegetable crops: A growth, yield and sustenance perspective. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 878498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.878498

10.3389/fpls.2022.87849835837452PMC9274134
19

Chauhdary, J.N., Li, H., Jiang, Y., Pan, X., Hussain, Z., Javaid, M., Rizwan, M. 2024. Advances in sprinkler irrigation: A review in the context of precision irrigation for crop production. Agronomy 14(1): 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14010047

10.3390/agronomy14010047
20

Chen, W.H., Mattson, N.S., You, F. 2022. Intelligent control and energy optimization in controlled environment agriculture via nonlinear model predictive control of semi-closed greenhouse. Applied Energy 320: 119334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119334

10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119334
21

Cheong, P.S., Bergs, J., Hawinkel, C., Famaey, J. 2017. Comparison of LoRaWAN classes and their power consumption. IEEE Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technology. pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SCVT.2017.8240313

10.1109/SCVT.2017.8240313
22

Citoni, B. 2022. LoRaWAN simulation and analysis for performance enhancement of realistic networks. Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

23

Costantino, A., Comba, L., Sicardi, G., Bariani, M., Fabrizio, E. 2021. Energy performance and climate control in mechanically ventilated greenhouses: A dynamic modeling-based assessment and investigation. Applied Energy 288: 116583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116583

10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116583
24

Cotrim, J.R., Kleinschmidt, J.H. 2020. LoRaWAN Mesh networks: A review and classification of multihop communication. Sensors 20(15): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20154273

10.3390/s2015427332751877PMC7435450
25

Da Rocha, Á.B., Fernandes, E.M., Dos Santos, C.A.C., Diniz, J.M.T., Junior, W.F.A. 2021. Development of a real-time surface solar radiation measurement system based on the Internet of Things (IoT). Sensors 21(11): 3836. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113836

10.3390/s2111383634206024PMC8198021
26

Et-taibi, B., Abid, M.R., Boufounas, E.M., Morchid, A., Bourhnane, S., Abu Hamed, T., Benhaddou, D. 2024. Enhancing water management in smart agriculture: A cloud and IoT-Based smart irrigation system. Results in Engineering 22: 102283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102283

10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102283
27

Fatima, T., Umar, R. 2025. Enhancing healthcare predictions with machine learning: A logistic regression-based model for heart disease detection. ResearchGate Report. February 2025.

28

Ferrante, A., Mariani, L. 2018. Agronomic management for enhancing plant tolerance to abiotic stresses: High and low values of temperature, light intensity, and relative humidity. Horticulturae 4(3): 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae4030021

10.3390/horticulturae4030021
29

Frausto-Vicencio, I., Moreno, A., Goldsmith, H., Hsu, Y.K., Hopkins, F.M. 2021.Characterizing the performance of a compact BTEX GC-PID for near-real time analysis and field deployment. Sensors 21(6):2064. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21062095

10.3390/s2106209533802681PMC8002566
30

Flach, T., Dukkipati, N., Terzis, A., Raghavan, B., Cardwell, N., Cheng, Y., Jain, A., Hao, S., Katz-Bassett, E., Govindan, R. 2013. Reducing web latency: The virtue of gentle aggression. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2013 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication. pp. 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1145/2486001.2486014

10.1145/2486001.2486014
31

Garcia, M., Patel, K. 2017. Implementing effective network security measures in financial systems: Lessons learned. Cybersecurity.

32

Getahun, S., Kefale, H., Gelaye, Y. 2024. Application of precision agriculture technologies for sustainable crop production and environmental sustainability: A systematic review. TheScientificWorldJournal 2024: 2126734. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2126734

10.1155/2024/212673439421732PMC11483651
33

Gkotsiopoulos, P., Zorbas, D., Douligeris, C. 2021. Performance determinants in LoRa networks: A literature review. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 23(3): 1721-1758. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2021.3090409

10.1109/COMST.2021.3090409
34

Glória, A., Sebastião, P., Dionísio, C., Simões, G., Cardoso, J. 2020. Water management for sustainable irrigation systems using Internet-of-Things. Sensors 20(5): 1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20051402

10.3390/s2005140232143482PMC7085535
35

Gorthi, S., Chakraborty, S., Li, B., Weindorf, D.C. 2020. A field-portable acoustic sensing device to measure soil moisture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 174: 105517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105517

10.1016/j.compag.2020.105517
36

Habeeb, H.A., Wahab, D.A., Azman, A.H., Alkahari, M.R. 2023. A design optimization method based on artificial intelligence (hybrid method) for repair and restoration using additive manufacturing technology. Metals 13(3):490. https://doi.org/10.3390/met13030490

10.3390/met13030490
37

Hamdan, S., Ayyash, M., Almajali, S. 2020. Edge-computing architectures for Internet of things applications: A survey. Sensors 20(22): 1-52. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226441

10.3390/s2022644133187267PMC7696529
38

Han, J., Chong, A., Lim, J., Ramasamy, S., Wong, N.H., Biljecki, F. 2024. Microclimate spatio-temporal prediction using deep learning and land use data. Building and Environment 253: 111358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111358

10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111358
39

Honkavaara, E., Eskelinen, M.A., Polonen, I., Saari, H., Ojanen, H., Mannila, R., Holmlund, C., Hakala, T., Litkey, P., Rosnell, T., Viljanen, N., Pulkkanen, M.. 2016. Remote sensing of 3-D geometry and surface moisture of a peat production area using hyperspectral frame cameras in visible to short-wave infrared spectral ranges onboard a small unmanned airborne vehicle (UAV). IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 54(9): 5440-5454. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2565471

10.1109/TGRS.2016.2565471
40

Hoseinzadeh, S., Garcia, D.A. 2024. Can AI predict the impact of its implementation in greenhouse farming? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 197: 114423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114423

10.1016/j.rser.2024.114423
41

Hosny, K.M., El-Hady, W.M., Samy, F.M. 2024. Technologies, protocols, and applications of Internet of Things in greenhouse farming: A survey of recent advances. Information Processing in Agriculture. 12: 91-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2024.04.002

10.1016/j.inpa.2024.04.002
42

Ihoume, A.E., Gandomi, A.H., Mahmud, M., Khosravi, A. 2023.TinyML-oriented deep learning model for intelligent greenhouse microclimate control.Intelligent systems design and applications: Proceedings of ISDA 2022. pp. 325-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7663-6_27

10.1007/978-981-19-7663-6_27
43

Iqbal, M.Z., Islam, M.N., Kabir, M.S., Gulandaz, M.A., Reza, M.N., Jang, S.H., Chung, S.O. 2023. Comparison of heating modules for suspension-type multipoint temperature variability management in smart greenhouses. Smart Agricultural Technology 5: 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2023.100296

10.1016/j.atech.2023.100296
44

Ismail, A.S., Mamat, M.H., Md Sin, N.D., Malek, M.F., Zoolfakar, A.S., Suriani, A.B., Mohamed, A., Ahmad, M.K., Rusop, M. 2016. Fabrication of hierarchical Sn-doped ZnO nanorod arrays through sonicated sol-gel immersion for room temperature, resistive-type humidity sensor applications. Ceramics International 42(8): 9785-9795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.071

10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.071
45

Kale, D. 2024. Artificial intelligence in sustainable agriculture: Enhancing efficiency and reducing environmental impact. August: 5-12.

46

Ketshabetswe, L.K., Zungeru, A.M., Mangwala, M., Chuma, J.M., Sigweni, B. 2019. Communication protocols for wireless sensor networks: A survey and comparison. Heliyon 5(5): e01591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01591

10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e0159131193432PMC6531673
47

Kim, T.H., Lee, K.Y., Ali, M.R., Reza, M.N., Chung, S.O., Kang, N.R. 2023. PID control for greenhouse climate regulation: A review. Precision Agriculture Science and Technology 5(2): 94. https://doi.org/10.12972/pastj.20230008

10.12972/pastj.20230008
48

Kontogiannis, S., Koundouras, S., Pikridas, C. 2024. Proposed fuzzy-stranded-neural network model that utilizes IoT plant-level sensory monitoring and distributed services for the early detection of downy mildew in viticulture. Computers 13(3): 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13030063

10.3390/computers13030063
49

Kowli, A., Rani, V., Sanap, M. 2023. Data-driven virtual sensing for spatial distribution of temperature and humidity. Journal of Building Engineering 67: 105949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105726

10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105726
50

Kufakunesu, R., Hancke, G.P., Abu-Mahfouz, A.M. 2020. A survey on adaptive data rate optimization in LoRaWAN: Recent solutions and major challenges. Sensors 20(18): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185044

10.3390/s2018504432899454PMC7571005
51

Kufakunesu, R., Hancke, G.P., Abu-Mahfouz, A.M. 2024. Collision avoidance adaptive data rate algorithm for LoRaWAN. Future Internet 16(10): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16100380

10.3390/fi16100380
52

Larsson, P., Gross, J., Al-Zubaidy, H., Rasmussen, L.K., Skoglund, M. 2016. Effective capacity of retransmission schemes: A recurrence relation approach. IEEE Transactions on Communications 64(11): 4817-4835. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2016.2602864

10.1109/TCOMM.2016.2602864
53

Lazarescu, M.T. 2013. Design of a WSN platform for long-term environmental monitoring for IoT applications. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems 3(1): 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1109/JETCAS.2013.2243032

10.1109/JETCAS.2013.2243032
54

Lee, M.H., Yao, M.H., Kow, P.Y., Kuo, B.J., Chang, F.J. 2024. An artificial intelligence-powered environmental control system for resilient and efficient greenhouse farming. Sustainability 16(24): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162410958

10.3390/su162410958
55

Lee, T.Y., Reza, M.N., Chung, S.O., Kim, D.U., Lee, S.Y., Choi, D.H. 2023. Application of fuzzy logics for smart agriculture: A review. Precision Agriculture Science and Technology 5(1): 1. https://doi.org/10.12972/pastj.20230001

10.12972/pastj.20230001
56

Lim, J.W., Reza, M.N., Chung, S.O., Lee, K.Y., Lee, S.Y., Lee, K.N., Lee, B. 2023. Application of artificial neural network in smart protected horticulture: A review. Precision Agriculture Science and Technology 5(1): 30. https://doi.org/10.12972/pastj.20230003

10.12972/pastj.20230003
57

Liu, Y., Xie, G., Tang, Y., Li, R. 2019. Improving real-time performance under reliability requirement assurance in automotive electronic systems. IEEE Access 7: 140875-140888. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2944204

10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2944204
58

López-Ortiz, J.E., Hernández-Nolasco, J.A., Carrillo-Nuñez, H., García-Vázquez, J.P. 2020. LoRaWAN module power consumption evaluation in a smart campus context. Sensors 20(17): 4794.

59

Lu, Y., Liu, M., Li, C., Liu, X., Cao, C., Li, X., Kan, Z. 2022. Precision fertilization and irrigation: Progress and applications. AgriEngineering 4(3): 626-655. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering4030041

10.3390/agriengineering4030041
60

Manfreda, S., McCabe, M.F., Miller, P.E., Lucas, R., Madrigal, V.P., Mallinis, G., Dor, E.B., Helman, D., Estes, L., Ciraolo, G., Müllerová, J., Tauro, F., de Lima, M.I., de Lima, J.L.M.P., Maltese, A., Frances, F., Caylor, K., Kohv, M., Perks, M., Toth, B. 2018. On the use of unmanned aerial systems for environmental monitoring. Remote Sensing 10(4): 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040641

10.3390/rs10040641
61

Mehic, M., Duliman, M., Selimovic, N., Voznak, M. 2022. LoRaWAN end nodes: Security and energy efficiency analysis. Alexandria Engineering Journal 61(11): 8997-9009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2022.02.035

10.1016/j.aej.2022.02.035
62

Mowla, M.N., Mowla, N., Shah, A.F.M.S., Rabie, K.M., Shongwe, T. 2023. Internet of Things and wireless sensor networks for smart agriculture applications: A survey. IEEE Access 11: 145813-145852. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3346299

10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3346299
63

Mueller, N.D., Gerber, J.S., Johnston, M., Ray, D.K., Ramankutty, N., Foley, J.A. 2012. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490(7419): 254-257. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11420

10.1038/nature1142022932270
64

Nadal, A., Llorach-Massana, P., Cuerva, E., López-Capel, E., Montero, J.I., Josa, A., Rieradevall, J., Royapoor, M. 2017. Building-integrated rooftop greenhouses: An energy and environmental assessment in the Mediterranean context. Applied Energy 187: 338-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.051

10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.051
65

Navarro-Serrano, F., López-Moreno, J.I., Azorin-Molina, C., Buisán, S., Domínguez-Castro, F., Sanmiguel-Vallelado, A., Alonso-González, E., Khorchani, M. 2019. Air temperature measurements using autonomous self-recording dataloggers in mountainous and snow-covered areas. Atmospheric Research 224: 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.03.034

10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.03.034
66

Park, J., Kim, J. 2021. An implementation design of unified protocol architecture for physical layer of LoRaWAN end-nodes. Electronics 10(20): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10202550

10.3390/electronics10202550
67

Parra-López, C., Ben Abdallah, S., Garcia-Garcia, G., Hassoun, A., Sánchez-Zamora, P., Trollman, H., Jagtap, S., Carmona-Torres, C. 2024. Integrating digital technologies in agriculture for climate change adaptation and mitigation: State of the art and future perspectives. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 226: 107176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109412

10.1016/j.compag.2024.109412
68

Parry, M.A.J., Reynolds, M., Salvucci, M.E., Raines, C., Andralojc, P.J., Zhu, X.G., Price, G.D., Condon, A.G., Furbank, R.T. 2011. Raising yield potential of wheat. II. Increasing photosynthetic capacity and efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany 62(2): 453-467. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq304

10.1093/jxb/erq30421030385
69

Ray, P.P., Skala, K. 2022. Internet of things aware secure dew computing architecture for distributed hotspot network: A conceptual study. Applied Sciences 12(18): 8963. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12188963

10.3390/app12188963
70

Rayhana, R., Xiao, G., Liu, Z. 2020. Internet of Things empowered smart greenhouse farming. IEEE Journal of Radio Frequency Identification 4(3): 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1109/JRFID.2020.2984391

10.1109/JRFID.2020.2984391
71

Renzone, G.D., Landi, E., Mugnaini, M., Parri, L., Peruzzi, G., Pozzebon, A. 2022. Assessment of LoRaWAN transmission systems under temperature and humidity, gas, and vibration aging effects within IoT contexts. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 71: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2021.3137568

10.1109/TIM.2021.3137568
72

Reza, M.N., Islam, M.N., Iqbal, M.Z., Kabir, M.S., Chowdhury, M., Gulandaz, M.A., Ali, M., Jang, M.K., Chung, S.O. 2023. Spatial, temporal, and vertical variability of ambient environmental conditions in Chinese solar greenhouses during winter. Applied Sciences 13(17): 9835. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179835

10.3390/app13179835
73

Ruan, Y., Li, J., Xiao, Q., Wu, Y., Shi, M. 2023. High-temperature failure evolution analysis of K-type film thermocouples. Micromachines 14(11): 2070. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14112070

10.3390/mi1411207038004927PMC10672794
74

Săcăleanu, D.I., Matache, M.G., Roșu, Ș.G., Florea, B.C., Manciu, I.P., Perișoară, L.A. 2024. IoT-enhanced decision support system for real-time greenhouse microclimate monitoring and control. Technologies 12(11): 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12110230

10.3390/technologies12110230
75

Sachtleben, R., Peleska, J. 2022. Effective grey-box testing with partial FSM models. Software Testing Verification and Reliability 32(2): 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/stvr.1806

10.1002/stvr.1806
76

Sadiqbatcha, S., Zhang, J., Amrouch, H., Tan, S.X.D. 2022. Real-time full-chip thermal tracking: A post-silicon, machine learning perspective. IEEE Transactions on Computers 71(6): 1411-1424.

77

Selvam, A.P. 2023. The impact of IoT and sensor integration on real-time weather monitoring systems: A systematic review. International Research Journal on Advanced Science Hub 5(11): 1-71. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3579172/v1

10.21203/rs.3.rs-3579172/v1
78

Shahab, H., Iqbal, M., Sohaib, A., Ullah Khan, F., Waqas, M. 2024. IoT-based agriculture management techniques for sustainable farming: A comprehensive review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 220: 108851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.108851

10.1016/j.compag.2024.108851
79

Shamshiri, R.R., Hameed, I.A., Thorp, K.R., Balasundram, S.K., Shafian, S., Fatemieh, M., Sultan, M., Mahns, B., Samiei, S. 2021. Greenhouse automation using wireless sensors and IoT instruments integrated with artificial intelligence. In Next-Generation Greenhouses for Food Security. pp. 1-22.

80

Sharma, K., Shivandu, S.K. 2024. Integrating artificial intelligence and Internet of Things (IoT) for enhanced crop monitoring and management in precision agriculture. Sensors International 5(August): 100292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2024.100292

10.1016/j.sintl.2024.100292
81

Singh, R.K., Aernouts, M., De Meyer, M., Weyn, M., Berkvens, R. 2020. Leveraging LoRaWAN technology for precision agriculture in greenhouses. Sensors 20(7): 1827. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20071827

10.3390/s2007182732218353PMC7181210
82

Singh, S. 2018. Agrometeorological requirements for sustainable vegetable crops production. Journal of Food Protection 2: 1-22.

83

Sun, A.Y., Scanlon, B.R. 2019. How can Big Data and machine learning benefit environment and water management: A survey of methods, applications, and future directions. Environmental Research Letters 14(7). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1b7d

10.1088/1748-9326/ab1b7d
84

Tamang, D., Pozzebon, A., Parri, L., Fort, A., Abrardo, A. 2022. Designing a reliable and low-latency LoRaWAN solution for environmental monitoring in factories at major accident risk. Sensors 22(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22062372

10.3390/s2206237235336543PMC8948738
85

Tang, X., Yang, J., Duan, Z., Bu, Y., Yuan, Z., Jiang, Y., Tai, H. 2024. Advances in paper-based photodetectors: Fabrications, performances, and applications. Advanced Optical Materials 2401114: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202401114

10.1002/adom.202401114
86

Thaenkaew, P., Quoitin, B., Meddahi, A. 2023. Leveraging larger AES keys in LoRaWAN: A practical evaluation of energy and time costs. Sensors 23(22): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23229172

10.3390/s2322917238005557PMC10674829
87

Ukoba, K., Olatunji, K.O., Adeoye, E., Jen, T.C., Madyira, D.M. 2024. Optimizing renewable energy systems through artificial intelligence: Review and future prospects. Energy and Environment 35(7): 3833-3879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X241256293

10.1177/0958305X241256293
88

Valente, J., Costa, D., Ventura, R., Catarino, A.P. 2023. IoT-enhanced decision support system for real-time greenhouse monitoring. Technologies 12(11): 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12110230

10.3390/technologies12110230
89

Wang, J., Fan, P.G. 2020. Research and implement of just-in-time dual buffer-queues in LoRaWAN gateways. 2020 IEEE 8th International Conference on Information, Communication and Networks, ICICN 2020. pp. 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICN51133.2020.9205105

10.1109/ICICN51133.2020.9205105
90

Wei, H., Xu, W., Kang, B., Eisner, R., Muleke, A., Rodriguez, D., deVoil, P., Sadras, V., Monjardino, M., Harrison, M.T. 2024. Irrigation with artificial intelligence: Problems, premises, promises. Human-Centric Intelligent Systems 4(2): 187-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44230-024-00072-4

10.1007/s44230-024-00072-4
91

Xue, J., Shou, G., Liu, Y., Hu, Y. 2024. Scheduling time-critical traffic with virtual queues in software-defined time-sensitive networking. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management 21(1): 967-978. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2023.3287634

10.1109/TNSM.2023.3287634
92

You, I., Kwon, S., Choudhary, G., Sharma, V., Seo, J.T. 2018. An enhanced LoRaWAN security protocol for privacy preservation in IoT with a case study on a smart factory-enabled parking system. Sensors 18(6): 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061888

10.3390/s1806188829890704PMC6021832
93

Zeng, K., Zheng, G., Ma, L., Ju, W., Pang, Y. 2019. Modeling three-dimensional spatiotemporal distributions of forest photosynthetically active radiation using UAV-Based lidar data. Remote Sensing 11(23): 2806. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11232806

10.3390/rs11232806
94

Zhang, C., Xu, K., Liu, K., Xu, J., Zheng, Z. 2022. Metal oxide resistive sensors for carbon dioxide detection. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 472: 214758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214758

10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214758
95

Zhao, G., Zhao, Q., Webber, H., Johnen, A., Rossi, V., Nogueira Junior, A.F. 2024. Integrating machine learning and change detection for enhanced crop disease forecasting in rice farming: A multi-regional study. European Journal of Agronomy 160: 127317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2024.127317

10.1016/j.eja.2024.127317
96

Zhao, N., Tan, Q., Dong, H., Pang, J., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Yao, X. 2021. Design and fabrication of thermocouple sensors based on a ceramic curved alumina substrate. IEEE Sensors Journal 21(18): 19780-19788. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3095098

10.1109/JSEN.2021.3095098
페이지 상단으로 이동하기